Difference between revisions of "TIIE - Program Report"

From Karnataka Open Educational Resources
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 52: Line 52:
  
 
=== 1. Students (feedback) –  ===
 
=== 1. Students (feedback) –  ===
 +
During our continuous interactions with the student from different school have given their valuable feedback which are listed below on the following:
 +
 +
# '''Mathematics'''
 +
 +
The mathematics module aimed to address the need of the individual child in the Foundational numeracy such as FLU, Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication.
 +
 +
Among these sessions Most of the children liked the FLU Model as they were able to understand the Place value and relate to solve the Number Operation. Students were given practice both manually and in the system using Tux Math, GCompris and phet simulation based on the level of the child. The students shared their opinion as Most of the sessions were conducted in the small groups It helped to engage in the activities, also desired to focus on individual learning of the students which develops the deeper understanding of the concepts. It creates a platform to get motivated by their peers towards the common goal and work together to support each others learning.
 +
 +
Mostly all the students revealed that Multiplication concept has helped them to comprehend the meaning of multiplication as groups of objects to find the product of any single digit number, Construction of the table was found easy using the number of lines and dots, Multiplication of two digits and more was the challenge we faced during regular method but After introducing to Area model helped us to learn in a very simple and interesting way.
 +
 +
There were few games related to foundational numeracy which helped them to relate it while solving the sums, also enhanced the mental ability of thinking and quick calculations.
 +
 +
'''2. Language:'''
 +
 +
The module was designed to be learner-centric and used '''storytelling as a pedagogical tool''' to develop listening, speaking and reading skills in English. All the Children enjoyed listening to stories and are familiar with narrative conventions. Stories provide an ideal introduction to Multilingual approach based on the students linguistic backgrounds. Most of the students liked the small group activities such as (Body parts game, Model for sticking body parts, Introducing yourself by passing the parcel, skit, poster making, ) etc This helped to participate effectively as a group.
 +
 +
* Most of the students liked the different stories used during the sessions because of Multilingual approach helped helped to comprehend better by repeating the same story in different languages, Perhaps It also helped us to learn other language too
 +
* Most of the students like language lab stories which helped to develop the LSRW skills, also to attempting all the different activities in the system felt us new learning to gain new information and new vocabulary.
 +
* Using of Assistive technology created more interest towards learning.
 +
* Most of the students liked the Voting for their classroom rules and prepared the poster on their favourite rule.
 +
 +
'''Overall feedback'''
 +
 +
* All the facilitators were very friendly and Polite, they never spoke harshly/ raised their voices/ scolded/ hit us.
 +
* They also motivated us to participate in all the activities, perhaps gave an opportunity to express our thoughts/ opinion.
 +
* Most of the time we were disturbing the facilitators by creating some new sense in the classroom, Inspite of all these challenges they helped us to learn the concepts which we were finding difficult.
 +
 +
'''Few Suggestions by the students:'''
 +
 +
* Few students in one of the school felt that they would learn more effective if there was no disturbance in the class.
 +
* Majority of the students and teachers are willing to continue the sessions for the Next Academic year.
 +
 
AS, MI - quant of coded part to derive categories, themes; NB – summary
 
AS, MI - quant of coded part to derive categories, themes; NB – summary
  

Revision as of 06:47, 28 March 2023

1. Executive Summary – APD

2. Introduction – APD

3. Program Objectives – APD

4. Program Design & Methodology – APD (include whatever is already there in program design document; include baseline report link)

      planned processes – reaching out to teachers, teacher educators, officials, CRP workshops, BIERT interactions

      modules link - TBD

5. Implementation – GMP, NB, RB

Inclusive education allows students with different needs and skills to attend conventional schools and get equal learning opportunities tailored to meet their needs. It is founded on the idea that all learners, regardless of their socioeconomic backgrounds, gender, physical or mental abilities, or range of skills, should study together. It recognizes that all children have the capacity to learn, takes into account the different learning styles of children, creates a conducive environment for learning, and develops appropriate instructional strategies and tools. Rather than being diagnostic in its approach, this module seeks to identify the most effective strategies for English language teaching in a structured manner to provide ample opportunities for practice in an accommodating environment.

how sessions were organized

Maths - GMP


 

how planned activities happened -

Cluster meetings- NB

NIMHANS - GMP

CRP workshops - RB

BIERT - GMP

Teacher's workshop (DL)) - RB

Resource centre setup- RB

Event based camps- GMP - NB

6. Student Endline – MI, AS

1. Endline objectives

2. Methodology – sampling, process, tools

3. Findings (objective, only factual)

1. Math

2. Lang

7. Reflections on the program

1. Students (feedback) –

During our continuous interactions with the student from different school have given their valuable feedback which are listed below on the following:

  1. Mathematics

The mathematics module aimed to address the need of the individual child in the Foundational numeracy such as FLU, Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication.

Among these sessions Most of the children liked the FLU Model as they were able to understand the Place value and relate to solve the Number Operation. Students were given practice both manually and in the system using Tux Math, GCompris and phet simulation based on the level of the child. The students shared their opinion as Most of the sessions were conducted in the small groups It helped to engage in the activities, also desired to focus on individual learning of the students which develops the deeper understanding of the concepts. It creates a platform to get motivated by their peers towards the common goal and work together to support each others learning.

Mostly all the students revealed that Multiplication concept has helped them to comprehend the meaning of multiplication as groups of objects to find the product of any single digit number, Construction of the table was found easy using the number of lines and dots, Multiplication of two digits and more was the challenge we faced during regular method but After introducing to Area model helped us to learn in a very simple and interesting way.

There were few games related to foundational numeracy which helped them to relate it while solving the sums, also enhanced the mental ability of thinking and quick calculations.

2. Language:

The module was designed to be learner-centric and used storytelling as a pedagogical tool to develop listening, speaking and reading skills in English. All the Children enjoyed listening to stories and are familiar with narrative conventions. Stories provide an ideal introduction to Multilingual approach based on the students linguistic backgrounds. Most of the students liked the small group activities such as (Body parts game, Model for sticking body parts, Introducing yourself by passing the parcel, skit, poster making, ) etc This helped to participate effectively as a group.

  • Most of the students liked the different stories used during the sessions because of Multilingual approach helped helped to comprehend better by repeating the same story in different languages, Perhaps It also helped us to learn other language too
  • Most of the students like language lab stories which helped to develop the LSRW skills, also to attempting all the different activities in the system felt us new learning to gain new information and new vocabulary.
  • Using of Assistive technology created more interest towards learning.
  • Most of the students liked the Voting for their classroom rules and prepared the poster on their favourite rule.

Overall feedback

  • All the facilitators were very friendly and Polite, they never spoke harshly/ raised their voices/ scolded/ hit us.
  • They also motivated us to participate in all the activities, perhaps gave an opportunity to express our thoughts/ opinion.
  • Most of the time we were disturbing the facilitators by creating some new sense in the classroom, Inspite of all these challenges they helped us to learn the concepts which we were finding difficult.

Few Suggestions by the students:

  • Few students in one of the school felt that they would learn more effective if there was no disturbance in the class.
  • Majority of the students and teachers are willing to continue the sessions for the Next Academic year.

AS, MI - quant of coded part to derive categories, themes; NB – summary

feedback from event based (forms, videos) - TBD

2. Teachers (feedback)

5 schools teachers(AY), teachers met through cluster meetings (NB, AS), event based camps (GMP)

3. HMs

HMs not being able to give time and other workload. Challenges in each school.

School info written by AY

8. Analysis (our perspective)

      analysis of the findings, what could be the reasons, implications, etc.

      case studies – hyperlink externally (RS to review and edit)

      school

   • students

Reflect on learnings from all sessions including those focussed on SEL. Need for socio-emotional support to students. Working on mental health and wellbeing. Giving them a space to share, empower them, help them deal with it and cope.

Effect of gadgets, movies, TV

They have very limited space, no playground

   • teachers

   • parents perspectives, challenges, awareness,

      administrative support

   • infra

   • staff, vacancies

   academic support

   • BIERT

   • CRP

   • block resource centre – IE resources wasn’t already existing

   • inclusive edu resource center

   medical/health support

   • NIMHANS

9. Recommendations

   • School & Teachers

   • School system

       ◦ Academic

       ◦ Administrative

       ◦ Policy

10. Conclusion